#Bbedit for mac 10.9.5 how to#
#Bbedit for mac 10.9.5 mac os#

Back in the day, I got around this not with Conflict Catcher, but by having multiple OS 9 folders that I'd switch between depending on the task. would have a crash-happy OS 9 experience.

#Bbedit for mac 10.9.5 how to#

Now anyone who wants to customize the UI, load in a bunch of stuff that they then forget how to remove, etc. There were no extra ports open, no extra stuff in memory that could be compromised/fail. This was due to the fact that they could strip out everything and have the web server essentially running on the hardware without much else getting in the way.

I seem to recall back then that the US Military was using OS 9 to host their web server. If you took OS 9 and stripped it right back, and then added precisely what you needed for a specific function, and only used it for that function, it was very stable and fast. If you just loaded whatever System extensions you wanted and ran badly coded software, you'd end up with memory leaks all over the place, and multiple 'kernel' extensions that attempted to modify the same memory space. The discrepancy is all about the fact that OS 9 provided no safety net. I have no experience of my own to share, just curious about the discrepancy. He couldn't do that with Windows and *wouldn't* do it for fear of missing his deadlines. He could leave PPC Macs rendering video for days without any fault or crash. He mentioned that most of them had never used anything older than Snow Leopard and completely missed the old days when PPC and Classic OS Macs were truly leagues above Windows in stability. I remember one guy on the Reaper (as in the DAW) forum saying that he found it funny how newer guys would talk about how much more stable Macs were than Windows PCs. Many a pro user would pine for the days of PPC Macs not running OS X. That's the exact opposite of what I'd always heard. To your point, it's really weird to read about people saying Classic OS was 'unstable' and 'crashed all the time'.

nothing wrong with that, they got a paycheck. as a network administrator will tell you, these are people that really don't think outside the box they can learn the applications, but lack will to want to really learn about the system.

#Bbedit for mac 10.9.5 mac os#

Anyone with 'memories' of how Mac OS 9 was unstable were 'Loosers' not 'Users' and simply put no effort into learning about the system itself. Try troubleshooting which agent is eating up resources on Yosemite and tell me that's easy ?! Even back in the days when OS 9 was current, we had systems up for months without a reboot or memory leak. I have to laugh at that one, since the OS has many modules loaded on top of microkernal, you can slim the system down very methodically and only load what you need, No 're-install' the whole OS issues, just 'turn off' what gives the crash.